GitHub|Since 2007
WPTR

esLucusHostvsNomeobe

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 1/11/2026

LucusHost
WPTR ScoreWinner1753 ms
Rank#215
TTFB1376ms
Time to 1MB157ms
Score1753
LCP1776ms
FCP1576ms
Nomeo
WPTR Score12126 ms
Rank#765
TTFB11389ms
Time to 1MB307ms
Score12126
LCP11789ms
FCP11589ms

Our Verdict

LucusHost wins with 1376ms TTFB (vs Nomeo's 11389ms)

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: WPTR Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.