GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

ptLusoVPSvsWebHSpt

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

LusoVPS
WPTR Score1941 ms
Rank#518
TTFB698ms
Time to 1MB449ms
Score1941
LCP1098ms
FCP898ms
WebHS
WPTR ScoreWinner1194 ms
Rank#297
TTFB811ms
Time to 1MB93ms
Score1194
LCP1211ms
FCP1011ms

Our Verdict

LusoVPS wins with 698ms TTFB (vs WebHS's 811ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseLusoVPSWebHSWinner
DNS Lookup218ms241msLusoVPS
TCP Connection283ms337msLusoVPS
TLS Handshake106ms132msLusoVPS
Server Processing256ms261msLusoVPS
Total TTFB863ms971msLusoVPS

Technology & Security Features

LusoVPS

Server/CDNApache/2.4.66 (Debia
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size20.8 KB

WebHS

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size250.6 KB
0/3
LusoVPS Security Features
1/3
WebHS Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.