GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

czMasterDCvsSavanacz

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

MasterDC
WPTR Score2203 ms
Rank#614
TTFB124ms
Time to 1MB918ms
Score2203
LCP524ms
FCP324ms
Savana
WPTR ScoreWinner797 ms
Rank#249
TTFB406ms
Time to 1MB208ms
Score797
LCP806ms
FCP606ms

Our Verdict

MasterDC wins with 124ms TTFB (vs Savana's 406ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseMasterDCSavanaWinner
DNS Lookup0ms1msMasterDC
TCP Connection0ms49msMasterDC
TLS Handshake0ms51msMasterDC
Server Processing0ms197msMasterDC
Total TTFB0ms298msMasterDC

Technology & Security Features

MasterDC

Server/CDNApache
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size4.6 KB

Savana

Server/CDNNginx
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size790.8 KB
1/3
MasterDC Security Features
1/3
Savana Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.