GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

arMesivsNeoloar

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

Mesi
WPTR ScoreWinner1485 ms
Rank#566
TTFB1476ms
Time to 1MB227ms
Score1485
LCP1876ms
FCP1676ms
Neolo
WPTR Score1688 ms
Rank#625
TTFB1290ms
Time to 1MB465ms
Score1688
LCP1690ms
FCP1490ms

Our Verdict

Neolo wins with 1290ms TTFB (vs Mesi's 1476ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseMesiNeoloWinner
DNS Lookup145ms34msNeolo
TCP Connection297ms183msNeolo
TLS Handshake170ms179msMesi
Server Processing328ms176msNeolo
Total TTFB940ms572msNeolo

Technology & Security Features

Mesi

Server/CDNnginx/1.28.0
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size59.4 KB

Neolo

Server/CDNApache
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size18.8 KB
1/3
Mesi Security Features
0/3
Neolo Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.