Microbyte SolutionsvsNames.co.uk
Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data
Test Date: 2/24/2026

Microbyte Solutions
View Details →
Names.co.uk
View Details →Our Verdict
Microbyte Solutions wins with 505ms TTFB (vs Names.co.uk's 1610ms)
TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)
| Phase | Microbyte Solutions | Names.co.uk | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Lookup | 212ms | 53ms | Names.co.uk |
| TCP Connection | 80ms | 187ms | Microbyte Solutions |
| TLS Handshake | 89ms | 383ms | Microbyte Solutions |
| Server Processing | 85ms | 899ms | Microbyte Solutions |
| Total TTFB | 466ms | 1522ms | Microbyte Solutions |
Technology & Security Features
Microbyte Solutions
Names.co.uk
TTFB Comparison Over Time
Understanding the Metrics
A Note on Hosting Selection
While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.
Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14
Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.