GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

inMilesWebvsUthoin

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/23/2026

MilesWeb
WPTR ScoreWinner2485 ms
Rank#651
TTFB30ms
Time to 1MB995ms
Score2485
LCP430ms
FCP230ms
Utho
WPTR Score3493 ms
Rank#739
TTFB264ms
Time to 1MB1235ms
Score3493
LCP664ms
FCP464ms

Our Verdict

MilesWeb wins with 30ms TTFB (vs Utho's 264ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseMilesWebUthoWinner
DNS Lookup64ms64msTie
TCP Connection6ms11msMilesWeb
TLS Handshake11ms16msMilesWeb
Server Processing16ms438msMilesWeb
Total TTFB97ms529msMilesWeb

Technology & Security Features

MilesWeb

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size9.4 KB

Utho

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size410.3 KB
2/3
MilesWeb Security Features
2/3
Utho Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.