GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

krMireenevsPHPS.krkr

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

Mireene
WPTR Score46755 ms
Rank#915
TTFB3435ms
Time to 1MB18904ms
Score46755
LCP3835ms
FCP3635ms
PHPS.kr
WPTR ScoreWinner5436 ms
Rank#821
TTFB3265ms
Time to 1MB1259ms
Score5436
LCP3665ms
FCP3465ms

Our Verdict

PHPS.kr wins with 3265ms TTFB (vs Mireene's 3435ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseMireenePHPS.krWinner
DNS Lookup292ms636msMireene
TCP Connection264ms567msMireene
TLS Handshake543ms543msTie
Server Processing286ms668msMireene
Total TTFB1385ms2414msPHPS.kr

Technology & Security Features

Mireene

Server/CDNApache
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size243.9 KB

PHPS.kr

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size36.8 KB
0/3
Mireene Security Features
0/3
PHPS.kr Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.