GitHub|Since 2007

GBMiss GroupvsNetitudeGB

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/23/2026

WPTR Score8131 ms
Rank#847
TTFB679ms
Time to 1MB3145ms
Score8131
LCP1079ms
FCP879ms
WPTR ScoreWinner483 ms
Rank#72
TTFB199ms
Time to 1MB115ms
Score483
LCP599ms
FCP399ms

Our Verdict

Netitude wins with 199ms TTFB (vs Miss Group's 679ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseMiss GroupNetitudeWinner
DNS Lookup64ms92msMiss Group
TCP Connection111ms5msNetitude
TLS Handshake89ms9msNetitude
Server Processing319ms101msNetitude
Total TTFB583ms207msNetitude

Technology & Security Features

Miss Group

Server/CDNLiteSpeed
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size47.9 KB

Netitude

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size207.5 KB
2/3
Miss Group Security Features
3/3
Netitude Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.