GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

saMobily BusinessvsSahara Netsa

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

Mobily Business

Mobily Business

View Details →
WPTR ScoreWinner5061 ms
Rank#804
TTFB1399ms
Time to 1MB1586ms
Score5061
LCP1799ms
FCP1599ms
Sahara Net
WPTR Score5111 ms
Rank#781
TTFB1256ms
Time to 1MB1354ms
Score5111
LCP1656ms
FCP1456ms

Our Verdict

Sahara Net wins with 1256ms TTFB (vs Mobily Business's 1399ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseMobily BusinessSahara NetWinner
DNS Lookup1ms588msMobily Business
TCP Connection111ms641msMobily Business
TLS Handshake257ms279msMobily Business
Server Processing886ms353msSahara Net
Total TTFB1255ms1861msSahara Net

Technology & Security Features

Mobily Business

Server/CDNUnknown
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size116.7 KB

Sahara Net

Server/CDNApache
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size359.4 KB
0/3
Mobily Business Security Features
0/3
Sahara Net Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.