Names.co.ukvsVirtuoso
Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data
Test Date: 2/25/2026

Names.co.uk
View Details →
Virtuoso
View Details →Our Verdict
Virtuoso wins with 92ms TTFB (vs Names.co.uk's 1176ms)
TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)
| Phase | Names.co.uk | Virtuoso | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Lookup | 54ms | 86ms | Names.co.uk |
| TCP Connection | 124ms | 14ms | Virtuoso |
| TLS Handshake | 226ms | 23ms | Virtuoso |
| Server Processing | 486ms | 240ms | Virtuoso |
| Total TTFB | 890ms | 363ms | Virtuoso |
Technology & Security Features
Names.co.uk
Virtuoso
TTFB Comparison Over Time
Understanding the Metrics
A Note on Hosting Selection
While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.
Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14
Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.