GitHub|Since 2007

brNapoleonvsUmblerbr

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/24/2026

WPTR Score2271 ms
Rank#582
TTFB702ms
Time to 1MB640ms
Score2271
LCP1102ms
FCP902ms
WPTR ScoreWinner2135 ms
Rank#686
TTFB2190ms
Time to 1MB274ms
Score2135
LCP2590ms
FCP2390ms

Our Verdict

Napoleon wins with 702ms TTFB (vs Umbler's 2190ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseNapoleonUmblerWinner
DNS Lookup5ms4msUmbler
TCP Connection246ms455msNapoleon
TLS Handshake244ms519msNapoleon
Server Processing240ms499msNapoleon
Total TTFB735ms1477msNapoleon

Technology & Security Features

Napoleon

Server/CDNLiteSpeed
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size846.1 KB

Umbler

Server/CDNMicrosoft-IIS/8.5
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size33.9 KB
1/3
Napoleon Security Features
0/3
Umbler Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.