GitHub|Since 2007

pkNayatelvsNexonHostpk

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

WPTR Score5486 ms
Rank#808
TTFB551ms
Time to 1MB1990ms
Score5486
LCP951ms
FCP751ms
WPTR ScoreWinner2390 ms
Rank#546
TTFB1493ms
Time to 1MB181ms
Score2390
LCP1893ms
FCP1693ms

Our Verdict

Nayatel wins with 551ms TTFB (vs NexonHost's 1493ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseNayatelNexonHostWinner
DNS Lookup177ms64msNexonHost
TCP Connection170ms10msNexonHost
TLS Handshake172ms18msNexonHost
Server Processing191ms1864msNayatel
Total TTFB710ms1956msNayatel

Technology & Security Features

Nayatel

Server/CDNUnknown
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size136.7 KB

NexonHost

Server/CDNnginx/1.18.0 (Ubuntu
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size552.9 KB
1/3
Nayatel Security Features
2/3
NexonHost Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.