GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

arNeolovsNuthostar

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

Neolo
WPTR ScoreWinner1688 ms
Rank#625
TTFB1290ms
Time to 1MB465ms
Score1688
LCP1690ms
FCP1490ms
Nuthost
WPTR Score3048 ms
Rank#653
TTFB922ms
Time to 1MB652ms
Score3048
LCP1322ms
FCP1122ms

Our Verdict

Nuthost wins with 922ms TTFB (vs Neolo's 1290ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseNeoloNuthostWinner
DNS Lookup34ms306msNeolo
TCP Connection183ms537msNeolo
TLS Handshake179ms257msNeolo
Server Processing176ms383msNeolo
Total TTFB572ms1483msNuthost

Technology & Security Features

Neolo

Server/CDNApache
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size18.8 KB

Nuthost

Server/CDNApache/2.4.65 (Unix)
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size8.5 KB
0/3
Neolo Security Features
0/3
Nuthost Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.