GitHub|Since 2007

siNeoservvsZabec.netsi

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

WPTR Score1345 ms
Rank#452
TTFB875ms
Time to 1MB267ms
Score1345
LCP1275ms
FCP1075ms
WPTR ScoreWinner1086 ms
Rank#308
TTFB350ms
Time to 1MB292ms
Score1086
LCP750ms
FCP550ms

Our Verdict

Zabec.net wins with 350ms TTFB (vs Neoserv's 875ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseNeoservZabec.netWinner
DNS Lookup12ms94msNeoserv
TCP Connection49ms70msNeoserv
TLS Handshake89ms113msNeoserv
Server Processing554ms108msZabec.net
Total TTFB704ms385msZabec.net

Technology & Security Features

Neoserv

Server/CDNnginx/1.10.3 (Ubuntu
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size280.6 KB

Zabec.net

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size24.5 KB
0/3
Neoserv Security Features
0/3
Zabec.net Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.