GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

huNethelyvsSybellhu

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

Nethely
WPTR Score1651 ms
Rank#431
TTFB242ms
Time to 1MB508ms
Score1651
LCP642ms
FCP442ms
Sybell
WPTR ScoreWinner1037 ms
Rank#278
TTFB80ms
Time to 1MB375ms
Score1037
LCP480ms
FCP280ms

Our Verdict

Sybell wins with 80ms TTFB (vs Nethely's 242ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseNethelySybellWinner
DNS Lookup57ms26msSybell
TCP Connection273ms51msSybell
TLS Handshake69ms28msSybell
Server Processing33ms32msSybell
Total TTFB432ms137msSybell

Technology & Security Features

Nethely

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size25.2 KB

Sybell

Server/CDNLiteSpeed
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size120.3 KB
0/3
Nethely Security Features
3/3
Sybell Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.