GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

GBNetitudevsSysGroupGB

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/24/2026

Netitude
WPTR ScoreWinner533 ms
Rank#29
TTFB90ms
Time to 1MB115ms
Score533
LCP490ms
FCP290ms
SysGroup
WPTR Score2926 ms
Rank#714
TTFB685ms
Time to 1MB1025ms
Score2926
LCP1085ms
FCP885ms

Our Verdict

Netitude wins with 90ms TTFB (vs SysGroup's 685ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseNetitudeSysGroupWinner
DNS Lookup116ms33msSysGroup
TCP Connection4ms12msNetitude
TLS Handshake9ms5msSysGroup
Server Processing128ms416msNetitude
Total TTFB257ms466msNetitude

Technology & Security Features

Netitude

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size207.5 KB

SysGroup

Server/CDNApache
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size102.3 KB
3/3
Netitude Security Features
1/3
SysGroup Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.