GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

GBNetitudevsTsoHostGB

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/23/2026

Netitude
WPTR ScoreWinner483 ms
Rank#72
TTFB199ms
Time to 1MB115ms
Score483
LCP599ms
FCP399ms
TsoHost
WPTR Score746 ms
Rank#314
TTFB664ms
Time to 1MB173ms
Score746
LCP1064ms
FCP864ms

Our Verdict

Netitude wins with 199ms TTFB (vs TsoHost's 664ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseNetitudeTsoHostWinner
DNS Lookup92ms1msTsoHost
TCP Connection5ms29msNetitude
TLS Handshake9ms32msNetitude
Server Processing101ms269msNetitude
Total TTFB207ms331msNetitude

Technology & Security Features

Netitude

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size207.5 KB

TsoHost

Server/CDNenvoy
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size897.1 KB
3/3
Netitude Security Features
0/3
TsoHost Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.