GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

GBNetitudevsXtravirtGB

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/24/2026

Netitude
WPTR ScoreWinner533 ms
Rank#29
TTFB90ms
Time to 1MB115ms
Score533
LCP490ms
FCP290ms
Xtravirt
WPTR Score1436 ms
Rank#363
TTFB265ms
Time to 1MB416ms
Score1436
LCP665ms
FCP465ms

Our Verdict

Netitude wins with 90ms TTFB (vs Xtravirt's 265ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseNetitudeXtravirtWinner
DNS Lookup116ms62msXtravirt
TCP Connection4ms242msNetitude
TLS Handshake9ms67msNetitude
Server Processing128ms67msXtravirt
Total TTFB257ms438msNetitude

Technology & Security Features

Netitude

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size207.5 KB

Xtravirt

Server/CDNLiteSpeed
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size408.2 KB
3/3
Netitude Security Features
3/3
Xtravirt Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.