GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

dkNetsitevsScanNetdk

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

Netsite
WPTR Score2838 ms
Rank#711
TTFB522ms
Time to 1MB1050ms
Score2838
LCP922ms
FCP722ms
ScanNet
WPTR ScoreWinner896 ms
Rank#368
TTFB638ms
Time to 1MB239ms
Score896
LCP1038ms
FCP838ms

Our Verdict

Netsite wins with 522ms TTFB (vs ScanNet's 638ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseNetsiteScanNetWinner
DNS Lookup57ms65msNetsite
TCP Connection122ms124msNetsite
TLS Handshake67ms67msTie
Server Processing72ms66msScanNet
Total TTFB318ms322msNetsite

Technology & Security Features

Netsite

Server/CDNApache
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size107.5 KB

ScanNet

Server/CDNUnknown
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size43.6 KB
1/3
Netsite Security Features
1/3
ScanNet Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.