GitHub|Since 2007

esNicaliavsWebempresaes

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

WPTR Score2113 ms
Rank#619
TTFB576ms
Time to 1MB744ms
Score2113
LCP976ms
FCP776ms
WPTR ScoreWinner1072 ms
Rank#291
TTFB478ms
Time to 1MB228ms
Score1072
LCP878ms
FCP678ms

Our Verdict

Webempresa wins with 478ms TTFB (vs Nicalia's 576ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseNicaliaWebempresaWinner
DNS Lookup189ms189msTie
TCP Connection46ms155msNicalia
TLS Handshake45ms63msNicalia
Server Processing47ms118msNicalia
Total TTFB327ms525msWebempresa

Technology & Security Features

Nicalia

Server/CDNLiteSpeed
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size168.0 KB

Webempresa

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size521.1 KB
1/3
Nicalia Security Features
0/3
Webempresa Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.