Nimbus HostingvsOpus Technology
Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data
Test Date: 2/24/2026

Nimbus Hosting
View Details →
Opus Technology
View Details →Our Verdict
Nimbus Hosting wins with 98ms TTFB (vs Opus Technology's 371ms)
TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)
| Phase | Nimbus Hosting | Opus Technology | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Lookup | 83ms | 116ms | Nimbus Hosting |
| TCP Connection | 16ms | 42ms | Nimbus Hosting |
| TLS Handshake | 21ms | 11ms | Opus Technology |
| Server Processing | 236ms | 93ms | Opus Technology |
| Total TTFB | 356ms | 262ms | Nimbus Hosting |
Technology & Security Features
Nimbus Hosting
Opus Technology
TTFB Comparison Over Time
Understanding the Metrics
A Note on Hosting Selection
While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.
Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14
Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.