GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

beNomeovsOpenmindsbe

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/24/2026

Nomeo
WPTR Score1897 ms
Rank#518
TTFB256ms
Time to 1MB678ms
Score1897
LCP656ms
FCP456ms
Openminds
WPTR ScoreWinner895 ms
Rank#413
TTFB851ms
Time to 1MB243ms
Score895
LCP1251ms
FCP1051ms

Our Verdict

Nomeo wins with 256ms TTFB (vs Openminds's 851ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseNomeoOpenmindsWinner
DNS Lookup213ms2msOpenminds
TCP Connection14ms55msNomeo
TLS Handshake22ms57msNomeo
Server Processing21ms198msNomeo
Total TTFB270ms312msNomeo

Technology & Security Features

Nomeo

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size9.4 KB

Openminds

Server/CDNApache
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size682.4 KB
3/3
Nomeo Security Features
1/3
Openminds Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.