GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

dkNordicwayvsScanNetdk

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

Nordicway
WPTR Score1706 ms
Rank#474
TTFB336ms
Time to 1MB522ms
Score1706
LCP736ms
FCP536ms
ScanNet
WPTR ScoreWinner896 ms
Rank#368
TTFB638ms
Time to 1MB239ms
Score896
LCP1038ms
FCP838ms

Our Verdict

Nordicway wins with 336ms TTFB (vs ScanNet's 638ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseNordicwayScanNetWinner
DNS Lookup125ms65msScanNet
TCP Connection55ms124msNordicway
TLS Handshake57ms67msNordicway
Server Processing216ms66msScanNet
Total TTFB453ms322msNordicway

Technology & Security Features

Nordicway

Server/CDNApache
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size287.6 KB

ScanNet

Server/CDNUnknown
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size43.6 KB
2/3
Nordicway Security Features
1/3
ScanNet Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.