GitHub|Since 2007

czONEbitvsWedoscz

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

WPTR ScoreWinner836 ms
Rank#254
TTFB402ms
Time to 1MB214ms
Score836
LCP802ms
FCP602ms
WPTR Score847 ms
Rank#311
TTFB790ms
Time to 1MB112ms
Score847
LCP1190ms
FCP990ms

Our Verdict

ONEbit wins with 402ms TTFB (vs Wedos's 790ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseONEbitWedosWinner
DNS Lookup42ms120msONEbit
TCP Connection48ms112msONEbit
TLS Handshake51ms20msWedos
Server Processing181ms326msONEbit
Total TTFB322ms578msONEbit

Technology & Security Features

ONEbit

Server/CDNNginx
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size790.8 KB

Wedos

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size1046.9 KB
1/3
ONEbit Security Features
2/3
Wedos Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.