GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

NLOxilionvsVimexxNL

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/24/2026

Oxilion
WPTR Score3695 ms
Rank#747
TTFB528ms
Time to 1MB1268ms
Score3695
LCP928ms
FCP728ms
Vimexx
WPTR ScoreWinner573 ms
Rank#90
TTFB194ms
Time to 1MB131ms
Score573
LCP594ms
FCP394ms

Our Verdict

Vimexx wins with 194ms TTFB (vs Oxilion's 528ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseOxilionVimexxWinner
DNS Lookup102ms51msVimexx
TCP Connection53ms49msVimexx
TLS Handshake53ms62msOxilion
Server Processing444ms97msVimexx
Total TTFB652ms259msVimexx

Technology & Security Features

Oxilion

Server/CDNLiteSpeed
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size168.4 KB

Vimexx

Server/CDNUnknown
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size100.3 KB
3/3
Oxilion Security Features
1/3
Vimexx Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.