GitHub|Since 2007

AUPanthurvsSuperloopAU

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/24/2026

WPTR ScoreWinner2877 ms
Rank#630
TTFB107ms
Time to 1MB989ms
Score2877
LCP507ms
FCP307ms
WPTR Score3246 ms
Rank#727
TTFB1311ms
Time to 1MB810ms
Score3246
LCP1711ms
FCP1511ms

Our Verdict

Panthur wins with 107ms TTFB (vs Superloop's 1311ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhasePanthurSuperloopWinner
DNS Lookup81ms139msPanthur
TCP Connection399ms34msSuperloop
TLS Handshake10ms829msPanthur
Server Processing13ms300msPanthur
Total TTFB503ms1302msPanthur

Technology & Security Features

Panthur

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size9.5 KB

Superloop

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size363.0 KB
0/3
Panthur Security Features
0/3
Superloop Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.