Piensa SolutionsvsTecnocrática
Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data
Test Date: 2/25/2026

Piensa Solutions
View Details →
Tecnocrática
View Details →Our Verdict
Piensa Solutions wins with 820ms TTFB (vs Tecnocrática's 5381ms)
TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)
| Phase | Piensa Solutions | Tecnocrática | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Lookup | 87ms | 0ms | Tecnocrática |
| TCP Connection | 308ms | 0ms | Tecnocrática |
| TLS Handshake | 146ms | 0ms | Tecnocrática |
| Server Processing | 138ms | 0ms | Tecnocrática |
| Total TTFB | 679ms | 0ms | Piensa Solutions |
Technology & Security Features
Piensa Solutions
Tecnocrática
TTFB Comparison Over Time
Understanding the Metrics
A Note on Hosting Selection
While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.
Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14
Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.