GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

fiPlaneettavsSeravofi

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

Planeetta
WPTR ScoreWinner949 ms
Rank#480
TTFB1383ms
Time to 1MB109ms
Score949
LCP1783ms
FCP1583ms
Seravo
WPTR Score1692 ms
Rank#648
TTFB1383ms
Time to 1MB450ms
Score1692
LCP1783ms
FCP1583ms

Our Verdict

Both providers have similar performance

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhasePlaneettaSeravoWinner
DNS Lookup196ms2msSeravo
TCP Connection149ms76msSeravo
TLS Handshake165ms79msSeravo
Server Processing177ms455msPlaneetta
Total TTFB687ms612msTie

Technology & Security Features

Planeetta

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size111.4 KB

Seravo

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size213.4 KB
1/3
Planeetta Security Features
1/3
Seravo Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.