GitHub|Since 2007

SGPrinceton Digital Group (PDG)vsVodien Internet SolutionsSG

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 1/11/2026

Princeton Digital Group (PDG)

Princeton Digital Group (PDG)

View Details
WPTR Score1386 ms
Rank#431
TTFB236ms
Time to 1MB479ms
Score1386
LCP636ms
FCP436ms
Vodien Internet Solutions

Vodien Internet Solutions

View Details
WPTR ScoreWinner1179 ms
Rank#360
TTFB245ms
Time to 1MB389ms
Score1179
LCP645ms
FCP445ms

Our Verdict

Princeton Digital Group (PDG) wins with 236ms TTFB (vs Vodien Internet Solutions's 245ms)

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: WPTR Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.