GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

noPRO ISPvsSyseno

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

PRO ISP
WPTR ScoreWinner1289 ms
Rank#356
TTFB611ms
Time to 1MB231ms
Score1289
LCP1011ms
FCP811ms
Syse
WPTR Score1353 ms
Rank#439
TTFB495ms
Time to 1MB409ms
Score1353
LCP895ms
FCP695ms

Our Verdict

Syse wins with 495ms TTFB (vs PRO ISP's 611ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhasePRO ISPSyseWinner
DNS Lookup274ms152msSyse
TCP Connection134ms67msSyse
TLS Handshake257ms68msSyse
Server Processing70ms84msPRO ISP
Total TTFB735ms371msSyse

Technology & Security Features

PRO ISP

Server/CDNopenresty
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size46.6 KB

Syse

Server/CDNApache/2.4.41 (Ubunt
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size27.0 KB
1/3
PRO ISP Security Features
1/3
Syse Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.