GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

noPRO ISPvsUniwebno

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

PRO ISP
WPTR ScoreWinner1289 ms
Rank#356
TTFB611ms
Time to 1MB231ms
Score1289
LCP1011ms
FCP811ms
Uniweb
WPTR Score1976 ms
Rank#582
TTFB536ms
Time to 1MB673ms
Score1976
LCP936ms
FCP736ms

Our Verdict

Uniweb wins with 536ms TTFB (vs PRO ISP's 611ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhasePRO ISPUniwebWinner
DNS Lookup274ms111msUniweb
TCP Connection134ms114msUniweb
TLS Handshake257ms69msUniweb
Server Processing70ms67msUniweb
Total TTFB735ms361msUniweb

Technology & Security Features

PRO ISP

Server/CDNopenresty
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size46.6 KB

Uniweb

Server/CDNWP.one
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size241.2 KB
1/3
PRO ISP Security Features
1/3
Uniweb Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.