GitHub|Since 2007

itPrometeusvsSeewebit

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

WPTR Score2177 ms
Rank#469
TTFB404ms
Time to 1MB488ms
Score2177
LCP804ms
FCP604ms
WPTR ScoreWinner849 ms
Rank#252
TTFB345ms
Time to 1MB236ms
Score849
LCP745ms
FCP545ms

Our Verdict

Seeweb wins with 345ms TTFB (vs Prometeus's 404ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhasePrometeusSeewebWinner
DNS Lookup491ms49msSeeweb
TCP Connection478ms88msSeeweb
TLS Handshake0ms80msPrometeus
Server Processing37ms66msPrometeus
Total TTFB1006ms283msSeeweb

Technology & Security Features

Prometeus

Server/CDNApache/2.4.25 (Debia
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size16.7 KB

Seeweb

Server/CDNApache
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size43.5 KB
0/3
Prometeus Security Features
1/3
Seeweb Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.