GitHub|Since 2007

ptPTServidorvsWebHSpt

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

WPTR Score1673 ms
Rank#524
TTFB526ms
Time to 1MB531ms
Score1673
LCP926ms
FCP726ms
WPTR ScoreWinner1194 ms
Rank#297
TTFB811ms
Time to 1MB93ms
Score1194
LCP1211ms
FCP1011ms

Our Verdict

PTServidor wins with 526ms TTFB (vs WebHS's 811ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhasePTServidorWebHSWinner
DNS Lookup141ms241msPTServidor
TCP Connection71ms337msPTServidor
TLS Handshake74ms132msPTServidor
Server Processing113ms261msPTServidor
Total TTFB399ms971msPTServidor

Technology & Security Features

PTServidor

Server/CDNApache
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size378.1 KB

WebHS

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size250.6 KB
1/3
PTServidor Security Features
1/3
WebHS Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.