PulsantvsTransparity
Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data
Test Date: 2/24/2026

Pulsant
View Details →
Transparity
View Details →Our Verdict
Pulsant wins with 91ms TTFB (vs Transparity's 191ms)
TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)
| Phase | Pulsant | Transparity | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Lookup | 24ms | 62ms | Pulsant |
| TCP Connection | 5ms | 13ms | Pulsant |
| TLS Handshake | 11ms | 22ms | Pulsant |
| Server Processing | 72ms | 195ms | Pulsant |
| Total TTFB | 112ms | 292ms | Pulsant |
Technology & Security Features
Pulsant
Transparity
TTFB Comparison Over Time
Understanding the Metrics
A Note on Hosting Selection
While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.
Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14
Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.