GitHub|Since 2007

cnQingCloudvsXinnetcn

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

WPTR ScoreWinner16166 ms
Rank#874
TTFB1999ms
Time to 1MB4366ms
Score16166
LCP2399ms
FCP2199ms
WPTR Score19111 ms
Rank#897
TTFB5268ms
Time to 1MB5634ms
Score19111
LCP5668ms
FCP5468ms

Our Verdict

QingCloud wins with 1999ms TTFB (vs Xinnet's 5268ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseQingCloudXinnetWinner
DNS Lookup383ms1292msQingCloud
TCP Connection1434ms3622msQingCloud
TLS Handshake632ms340msXinnet
Server Processing3239ms335msXinnet
Total TTFB5688ms5589msQingCloud

Technology & Security Features

QingCloud

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size232.5 KB

Xinnet

Server/CDNLego Server
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size157.5 KB
0/3
QingCloud Security Features
1/3
Xinnet Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.