ROMARGvsWebFactor
Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data
Test Date: 2/25/2026

ROMARG
View Details →
WebFactor
View Details →Our Verdict
WebFactor wins with 357ms TTFB (vs ROMARG's 440ms)
TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)
| Phase | ROMARG | WebFactor | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Lookup | 202ms | 167ms | WebFactor |
| TCP Connection | 123ms | 160ms | ROMARG |
| TLS Handshake | 145ms | 44ms | WebFactor |
| Server Processing | 78ms | 679ms | ROMARG |
| Total TTFB | 548ms | 1050ms | WebFactor |
Technology & Security Features
ROMARG
WebFactor
TTFB Comparison Over Time
Understanding the Metrics
A Note on Hosting Selection
While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.
Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14
Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.