GitHub|Since 2007

saSahara NetvsSite.sasa

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

WPTR Score5111 ms
Rank#781
TTFB1256ms
Time to 1MB1354ms
Score5111
LCP1656ms
FCP1456ms
WPTR ScoreWinner3658 ms
Rank#720
TTFB533ms
Time to 1MB1096ms
Score3658
LCP933ms
FCP733ms

Our Verdict

Site.sa wins with 533ms TTFB (vs Sahara Net's 1256ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseSahara NetSite.saWinner
DNS Lookup588ms240msSite.sa
TCP Connection641ms383msSite.sa
TLS Handshake279ms265msSite.sa
Server Processing353ms140msSite.sa
Total TTFB1861ms1028msSite.sa

Technology & Security Features

Sahara Net

Server/CDNApache
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size359.4 KB

Site.sa

Server/CDNUnknown
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size3.5 KB
0/3
Sahara Net Security Features
1/3
Site.sa Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.