Sahara NetvsSite.sa
Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data
Test Date: 2/25/2026

Sahara Net
View Details →
Site.sa
View Details →Our Verdict
Site.sa wins with 533ms TTFB (vs Sahara Net's 1256ms)
TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)
| Phase | Sahara Net | Site.sa | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Lookup | 588ms | 240ms | Site.sa |
| TCP Connection | 641ms | 383ms | Site.sa |
| TLS Handshake | 279ms | 265ms | Site.sa |
| Server Processing | 353ms | 140ms | Site.sa |
| Total TTFB | 1861ms | 1028ms | Site.sa |
Technology & Security Features
Sahara Net
Site.sa
TTFB Comparison Over Time
Understanding the Metrics
A Note on Hosting Selection
While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.
Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14
Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.