Sakura InternetvsWadax
Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data
Test Date: 2/23/2026

Sakura Internet
View Details →
Wadax
View Details →Our Verdict
Wadax wins with 87ms TTFB (vs Sakura Internet's 2925ms)
TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)
| Phase | Sakura Internet | Wadax | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Lookup | 1456ms | 117ms | Wadax |
| TCP Connection | 934ms | 78ms | Wadax |
| TLS Handshake | 631ms | 12ms | Wadax |
| Server Processing | 280ms | 716ms | Sakura Internet |
| Total TTFB | 3301ms | 923ms | Wadax |
Technology & Security Features
Sakura Internet
Wadax
TTFB Comparison Over Time
Understanding the Metrics
A Note on Hosting Selection
While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.
Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14
Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.