GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

dkScanNetvsWannafinddk

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

ScanNet
WPTR ScoreWinner896 ms
Rank#368
TTFB638ms
Time to 1MB239ms
Score896
LCP1038ms
FCP838ms
Wannafind
WPTR Score951 ms
Rank#318
TTFB447ms
Time to 1MB261ms
Score951
LCP847ms
FCP647ms

Our Verdict

Wannafind wins with 447ms TTFB (vs ScanNet's 638ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseScanNetWannafindWinner
DNS Lookup65ms62msWannafind
TCP Connection124ms125msScanNet
TLS Handshake67ms71msScanNet
Server Processing66ms67msScanNet
Total TTFB322ms325msWannafind

Technology & Security Features

ScanNet

Server/CDNUnknown
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size43.6 KB

Wannafind

Server/CDNUnknown
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size37.9 KB
1/3
ScanNet Security Features
1/3
Wannafind Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.