GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

NOServeboltvsSyseno

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

Servebolt
WPTR ScoreWinner376 ms
Rank#8
TTFB49ms
Time to 1MB111ms
Score376
LCP449ms
FCP249ms
Syse
WPTR Score1353 ms
Rank#439
TTFB495ms
Time to 1MB409ms
Score1353
LCP895ms
FCP695ms

Our Verdict

Servebolt wins with 49ms TTFB (vs Syse's 495ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseServeboltSyseWinner
DNS Lookup57ms152msServebolt
TCP Connection5ms67msServebolt
TLS Handshake10ms68msServebolt
Server Processing38ms84msServebolt
Total TTFB110ms371msServebolt

Technology & Security Features

Servebolt

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size275.1 KB

Syse

Server/CDNApache/2.4.41 (Ubunt
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size27.0 KB
3/3
Servebolt Security Features
1/3
Syse Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.