GitHub|Since 2007

itServer.itvsShellrentit

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

WPTR Score2527 ms
Rank#646
TTFB46ms
Time to 1MB1006ms
Score2527
LCP446ms
FCP246ms
WPTR ScoreWinner442 ms
Rank#63
TTFB211ms
Time to 1MB98ms
Score442
LCP611ms
FCP411ms

Our Verdict

Server.it wins with 46ms TTFB (vs Shellrent's 211ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseServer.itShellrentWinner
DNS Lookup66ms7msShellrent
TCP Connection11ms11msTie
TLS Handshake15ms15msTie
Server Processing21ms174msServer.it
Total TTFB113ms207msServer.it

Technology & Security Features

Server.it

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size9.3 KB

Shellrent

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size1201.5 KB
2/3
Server.it Security Features
2/3
Shellrent Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.