GitHub|Since 2007

mxServerisvsSuEmpresamx

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

WPTR Score19561 ms
Rank#899
TTFB2656ms
Time to 1MB7891ms
Score19561
LCP3056ms
FCP2856ms
WPTR ScoreWinner415 ms
Rank#20
TTFB72ms
Time to 1MB116ms
Score415
LCP472ms
FCP272ms

Our Verdict

SuEmpresa wins with 72ms TTFB (vs Serveris's 2656ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseServerisSuEmpresaWinner
DNS Lookup83ms63msSuEmpresa
TCP Connection16ms13msSuEmpresa
TLS Handshake22ms17msSuEmpresa
Server Processing502ms44msSuEmpresa
Total TTFB623ms137msSuEmpresa

Technology & Security Features

Serveris

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size65.8 KB

SuEmpresa

Server/CDNcloudflare
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Enabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size267.9 KB
2/3
Serveris Security Features
3/3
SuEmpresa Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.