Shock MediavsWorldstream
Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data
Test Date: 2/25/2026

Shock Media
View Details →
Worldstream
View Details →Our Verdict
Worldstream wins with 443ms TTFB (vs Shock Media's 814ms)
TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)
| Phase | Shock Media | Worldstream | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Lookup | 1ms | 88ms | Shock Media |
| TCP Connection | 48ms | 78ms | Shock Media |
| TLS Handshake | 57ms | 105ms | Shock Media |
| Server Processing | 628ms | 92ms | Worldstream |
| Total TTFB | 734ms | 363ms | Worldstream |
Technology & Security Features
Shock Media
Worldstream
TTFB Comparison Over Time
Understanding the Metrics
A Note on Hosting Selection
While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.
Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14
Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.