GitHub|Since 2007

BGSiteGroundvsVPS.BGbg

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/23/2026

WPTR Score1208 ms
Rank#367
TTFB440ms
Time to 1MB325ms
Score1208
LCP840ms
FCP640ms
WPTR ScoreWinner493 ms
Rank#241
TTFB630ms
Time to 1MB116ms
Score493
LCP1030ms
FCP830ms

Our Verdict

SiteGround wins with 440ms TTFB (vs VPS.BG's 630ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseSiteGroundVPS.BGWinner
DNS Lookup49ms27msVPS.BG
TCP Connection17ms42msSiteGround
TLS Handshake16ms37msSiteGround
Server Processing346ms109msVPS.BG
Total TTFB428ms215msSiteGround

Technology & Security Features

SiteGround

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size89.2 KB

VPS.BG

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size155.8 KB
2/3
SiteGround Security Features
1/3
VPS.BG Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.