GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

noUniwebvsWebhusetno

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

Uniweb
WPTR Score1976 ms
Rank#582
TTFB536ms
Time to 1MB673ms
Score1976
LCP936ms
FCP736ms
Webhuset
WPTR ScoreWinner968 ms
Rank#288
TTFB451ms
Time to 1MB232ms
Score968
LCP851ms
FCP651ms

Our Verdict

Webhuset wins with 451ms TTFB (vs Uniweb's 536ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseUniwebWebhusetWinner
DNS Lookup111ms119msUniweb
TCP Connection114ms61msWebhuset
TLS Handshake69ms121msUniweb
Server Processing67ms110msUniweb
Total TTFB361ms411msWebhuset

Technology & Security Features

Uniweb

Server/CDNWP.one
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size241.2 KB

Webhuset

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Enabled
Page Size49.3 KB
1/3
Uniweb Security Features
2/3
Webhuset Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.