GitHub|Since 2007

nzWebdrivevsWebslicenz

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

WPTR Score31285 ms
Rank#911
TTFB137ms
Time to 1MB12732ms
Score31285
LCP537ms
FCP337ms
WPTR ScoreWinner3350 ms
Rank#688
TTFB2402ms
Time to 1MB107ms
Score3350
LCP2802ms
FCP2602ms

Our Verdict

Webdrive wins with 137ms TTFB (vs Webslice's 2402ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseWebdriveWebsliceWinner
DNS Lookup452ms926msWebdrive
TCP Connection167ms1276msWebdrive
TLS Handshake55ms300msWebdrive
Server Processing54ms591msWebdrive
Total TTFB728ms3093msWebdrive

Technology & Security Features

Webdrive

Server/CDNUnknown
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size0.2 KB

Webslice

Server/CDNnginx
HSTS Disabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size154.4 KB
0/3
Webdrive Security Features
0/3
Webslice Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.