Wessex ITvsXtravirt
Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data
Test Date: 2/24/2026

Wessex IT
View Details →
Xtravirt
View Details →Our Verdict
Xtravirt wins with 265ms TTFB (vs Wessex IT's 366ms)
TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)
| Phase | Wessex IT | Xtravirt | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Lookup | 109ms | 62ms | Xtravirt |
| TCP Connection | 308ms | 242ms | Xtravirt |
| TLS Handshake | 52ms | 67ms | Wessex IT |
| Server Processing | 56ms | 67ms | Wessex IT |
| Total TTFB | 525ms | 438ms | Xtravirt |
Technology & Security Features
Wessex IT
Xtravirt
TTFB Comparison Over Time
Understanding the Metrics
A Note on Hosting Selection
While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.
Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14
Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.