GitHub|Since 2007
Wptr Lab

cnXinnetvsZZIDCcn

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

Xinnet
WPTR Score19111 ms
Rank#897
TTFB5268ms
Time to 1MB5634ms
Score19111
LCP5668ms
FCP5468ms
ZZIDC
WPTR ScoreWinner8562 ms
Rank#863
TTFB3505ms
Time to 1MB2670ms
Score8562
LCP3905ms
FCP3705ms

Our Verdict

ZZIDC wins with 3505ms TTFB (vs Xinnet's 5268ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

PhaseXinnetZZIDCWinner
DNS Lookup1292ms617msZZIDC
TCP Connection3622ms728msZZIDC
TLS Handshake340ms290msZZIDC
Server Processing335ms519msXinnet
Total TTFB5589ms2154msZZIDC

Technology & Security Features

Xinnet

Server/CDNLego Server
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size157.5 KB

ZZIDC

Server/CDNUnknown
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size117.3 KB
1/3
Xinnet Security Features
1/3
ZZIDC Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.