GitHub|Since 2007

ru1Gb.ruvsSmartaperu

Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data

Test Date: 2/25/2026

WPTR Score1570 ms
Rank#603
TTFB1886ms
Time to 1MB155ms
Score1570
LCP2286ms
FCP2086ms
WPTR ScoreWinner1148 ms
Rank#421
TTFB895ms
Time to 1MB209ms
Score1148
LCP1295ms
FCP1095ms

Our Verdict

Smartape wins with 895ms TTFB (vs 1Gb.ru's 1886ms)

TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)

Phase1Gb.ruSmartapeWinner
DNS Lookup260ms142msSmartape
TCP Connection84ms46msSmartape
TLS Handshake168ms48msSmartape
Server Processing686ms410msSmartape
Total TTFB1198ms646msSmartape

Technology & Security Features

1Gb.ru

Server/CDNnginx/1.16.1
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size84.1 KB

Smartape

Server/CDNddos-guard
HSTS Enabled
Brotli Compression Disabled
HTTP/3 (QUIC) Disabled
Page Size98.7 KB
1/3
1Gb.ru Security Features
1/3
Smartape Security Features

TTFB Comparison Over Time

Understanding the Metrics

WPTR Score: Wptr Lab Real-Load Score: (Time to 1MB x 2.4) + TTFB. Raw server & network performance (Lower is better).
TTFB: Time to First Byte - How fast the server responds
Time to 1MB: Time to 1MB - Time taken to download 1MB of data (lower is better)
LCP: Largest Contentful Paint - When main content loads
FCP: First Contentful Paint - When first content appears
Score: Overall performance score (0-100)

A Note on Hosting Selection

While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.

Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14

Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.