2nd WatchvsLumen Technologies
Head-to-head hosting performance comparison based on real test data
Test Date: 2/23/2026

2nd Watch
View Details →
Lumen Technologies
View Details →Our Verdict
2nd Watch wins with 168ms TTFB (vs Lumen Technologies's 274ms)
TTFB Breakdown (Connection Phases)
| Phase | 2nd Watch | Lumen Technologies | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| DNS Lookup | 97ms | 5ms | Lumen Technologies |
| TCP Connection | 134ms | 45ms | Lumen Technologies |
| TLS Handshake | 44ms | 17ms | Lumen Technologies |
| Server Processing | 62ms | 669ms | 2nd Watch |
| Total TTFB | 337ms | 736ms | 2nd Watch |
Technology & Security Features
2nd Watch
Lumen Technologies
TTFB Comparison Over Time
Understanding the Metrics
A Note on Hosting Selection
While TTFB and performance metrics are important indicators, choosing the right hosting provider involves many other factors: security measures, customer support quality, uptime guarantees, scalability options, and pricing structure. Academic research emphasizes that a balanced approach considering all these aspects leads to better long-term outcomes.
Chizhov, A., & Fesenko, A. (2025). Web hosting companies' client solutions: A study of a strategic standpoint. Corporate & Business Strategy Review. doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv6i1art14
Data in this comparison is obtained through independent tests using our TTFB Checker tool.